@article {302, title = {Unsupervised Transfer Learning via Multi-Scale Convolutional Sparse Coding for Biomedical Applications.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell}, volume = {40}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 May}, pages = {1182-1194}, abstract = {

The capabilities of (I) learning transferable knowledge across domains; and (II) fine-tuning the pre-learned base knowledge towards tasks with considerably smaller data scale are extremely important. Many of the existing transfer learning techniques are supervised approaches, among which deep learning has the demonstrated power of learning domain transferrable knowledge with large scale network trained on massive amounts of labeled data. However, in many biomedical tasks, both the data and the corresponding label can be very limited, where the unsupervised transfer learning capability is urgently needed. In this paper, we proposed a novel multi-scale convolutional sparse coding (MSCSC) method, that (I) automatically learns filter banks at different scales in a joint fashion with enforced scale-specificity of learned patterns; and (II) provides an unsupervised solution for learning transferable base knowledge and fine-tuning it towards target tasks. Extensive experimental evaluation of MSCSC demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed MSCSC in both regular and transfer learning tasks in various biomedical domains.

}, issn = {1939-3539}, doi = {10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2656884}, author = {Hang Chang and Han, Ju and Zhong, Cheng and Snijders, Antoine M and Mao, Jian-Hua} } @article {303, title = {When machine vision meets histology: A comparative evaluation of model architecture for classification of histology sections.}, journal = {Med Image Anal}, volume = {35}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 01}, pages = {530-543}, abstract = {

Classification of histology sections in large cohorts, in terms of distinct regions of microanatomy (e.g., stromal) and histopathology (e.g., tumor, necrosis), enables the quantification of tumor composition, and the construction of predictive models of genomics and clinical outcome. To tackle the large technical variations and biological heterogeneities, which are intrinsic in large cohorts, emerging systems utilize either prior knowledge from pathologists or unsupervised feature learning for invariant representation of the underlying properties in the data. However, to a large degree, the architecture for tissue histology classification remains unexplored and requires urgent systematical investigation. This paper is the first attempt to provide insights into three fundamental questions in tissue histology classification: I. Is unsupervised feature learning preferable to human engineered features? II. Does cellular saliency help? III. Does the sparse feature encoder contribute to recognition? We show that (a) in I, both Cellular Morphometric Feature and features from unsupervised feature learning lead to superior performance when compared to SIFT and [Color, Texture]; (b) in II, cellular saliency incorporation impairs the performance for systems built upon pixel-/patch-level features; and (c) in III, the effect of the sparse feature encoder is correlated with the robustness of features, and the performance can be consistently improved by the multi-stage extension of systems built upon both Cellular Morphmetric Feature and features from unsupervised feature learning. These insights are validated with two cohorts of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and Kidney Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC).

}, keywords = {Color, Histological Techniques, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Unsupervised Machine Learning}, issn = {1361-8423}, doi = {10.1016/j.media.2016.08.010}, author = {Zhong, Cheng and Han, Ju and Borowsky, Alexander and Parvin, Bahram and Wang, Yunfu and Hang Chang} } @article {102, title = {Phenotypic Characterization of Breast Invasive Carcinoma via Transferable Tissue Morphometric Patterns learned from Glioblastoma Multiforme.}, journal = {Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging}, volume = {2016}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Apr}, pages = {1025-1028}, abstract = {

Quantitative analysis of whole slide images (WSIs) in a large cohort may provide predictive models of clinical outcome. However, the performance of the existing techniques is hindered as a result of large technical variations (e.g., fixation, staining) and biological heterogeneities (e.g., cell type, cell state) that are always present in a large cohort. Although unsupervised feature learning provides a promising way in learning pertinent features without human intervention, its capability can be greatly limited due to the lack of well-curated examples. In this paper, we explored the transferability of knowledge acquired from a well-curated Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) dataset through its application to the representation and characterization of tissue histology from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Breast Invasive Carcinoma (BRCA) cohort. Our experimental results reveals two major phenotypic subtypes with statistically significantly different survival curves. Further differential expression analysis of these two subtypes indicates enrichment of genes regulated by NF-kB in response to TNF and genes up-regulated in response to IFNG.

}, issn = {1945-7928}, doi = {10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493440}, author = {Han, Ju and Fontenay, Gerald V and Wang, Yunfu and Jiang-Hua Mao and Hang Chang} } @article {241, title = {Stiffness of the microenvironment upregulates ERBB2 expression in 3D cultures of MCF10A within the range of mammographic density.}, journal = {Sci Rep}, volume = {6}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, pages = {28987}, abstract = {

The effects of the stiffness of the microenvironment on the molecular response of 3D colony organization, at the maximum level of mammographic density (MD), are investigated. Phenotypic profiling reveals that 3D colony formation is heterogeneous and increased stiffness of the microenvironment, within the range of the MD, correlates with the increased frequency of aberrant 3D colony formation. Further integrative analysis of the genome-wide transcriptome and phenotypic profiling hypothesizes overexpression of ERBB2 in the premalignant MCF10A cell lines at a stiffness value that corresponds to the collagen component at high mammographic density. Subsequently, ERBB2 overexpression has been validated in the same cell line. Similar experiments with a more genetically stable cell line of 184A1 also revealed an increased frequency of aberrant colony formation with the increased stiffness; however, 184A1 did not demonstrate overexpression of ERBB2 at the same stiffness value of the high MD. These results suggest that stiffness exacerbates premalignant cell line of MCF10A.

}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {10.1038/srep28987}, author = {Cheng, Qingsu and Bilgin, Cemal Cagatay and Fonteney, Gerald and Hang Chang and Henderson, Matthew and Han, Ju and Parvin, Bahram} } @article {242, title = {When machine vision meets histology: A comparative evaluation of model architecture for classification of histology sections.}, journal = {Med Image Anal}, volume = {35}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Sep 9}, pages = {530-543}, abstract = {

Classification of histology sections in large cohorts, in terms of distinct regions of microanatomy (e.g., stromal) and histopathology (e.g., tumor, necrosis), enables the quantification of tumor composition, and the construction of predictive models of genomics and clinical outcome. To tackle the large technical variations and biological heterogeneities, which are intrinsic in large cohorts, emerging systems utilize either prior knowledge from pathologists or unsupervised feature learning for invariant representation of the underlying properties in the data. However, to a large degree, the architecture for tissue histology classification remains unexplored and requires urgent systematical investigation. This paper is the first attempt to provide insights into three fundamental questions in tissue histology classification: I. Is unsupervised feature learning preferable to human engineered features? II. Does cellular saliency help? III. Does the sparse feature encoder contribute to recognition? We show that (a) in I, both Cellular Morphometric Feature and features from unsupervised feature learning lead to superior performance when compared to SIFT and [Color, Texture]; (b) in II, cellular saliency incorporation impairs the performance for systems built upon pixel-/patch-level features; and (c) in III, the effect of the sparse feature encoder is correlated with the robustness of features, and the performance can be consistently improved by the multi-stage extension of systems built upon both Cellular Morphmetric Feature and features from unsupervised feature learning. These insights are validated with two cohorts of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and Kidney Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC).

}, issn = {1361-8423}, doi = {10.1016/j.media.2016.08.010}, author = {Zhong, Cheng and Han, Ju and Borowsky, Alexander and Parvin, Bahram and Wang, Yunfu and Hang Chang} } @article {87, title = {Molecular predictors of 3D morphogenesis by breast cancer cell lines in 3D culture}, journal = {PLoS Comput Biol}, volume = {6}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Feb}, pages = {e1000684}, abstract = {

Correlative analysis of molecular markers with phenotypic signatures is the simplest model for hypothesis generation. In this paper, a panel of 24 breast cell lines was grown in 3D culture, their morphology was imaged through phase contrast microscopy, and computational methods were developed to segment and represent each colony at multiple dimensions. Subsequently, subpopulations from these morphological responses were identified through consensus clustering to reveal three clusters of round, grape-like, and stellate phenotypes. In some cases, cell lines with particular pathobiological phenotypes clustered together (e.g., ERBB2 amplified cell lines sharing the same morphometric properties as the grape-like phenotype). Next, associations with molecular features were realized through (i) differential analysis within each morphological cluster, and (ii) regression analysis across the entire panel of cell lines. In both cases, the dominant genes that are predictive of the morphological signatures were identified. Specifically, PPARgamma has been associated with the invasive stellate morphological phenotype, which corresponds to triple-negative pathobiology. PPARgamma has been validated through two supporting biological assays.

}, keywords = {Biological, Biomarkers, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Computer-Assisted, ErbB-2, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Image Processing, Models, Phenotype, PPAR gamma, Receptor, Reproducibility of Results, Tumor}, issn = {1553-7358}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000684}, author = {Han, Ju and Hang Chang and Giricz, Orsi and Lee, Genee Y and Baehner, Frederick L and Gray, Joe W and Bissell, Mina J and Kenny, Paraic A and Parvin, Bahram} }